Discuz! Board

 找回密码
 立即注册
搜索
热搜: 活动 交友 discuz
查看: 6|回复: 0

Kilojoule

[复制链接]

9万

主题

9万

帖子

29万

积分

论坛元老

Rank: 8Rank: 8

积分
293221
发表于 2021-8-31 23:16:32 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
Hi,At the bottom a WPQR there is a statement that states the test meets the requirements of say AWS D1.1 1988.I always wondered if a company that qualifies it's own welding procedures and certifies it's own welders to that procedure needs to keep to changing the date on the bottom of the WPQR every time a new code book comes out or keep the year that the procedure was qualifiedThanks,
Reply:Did you keep the coupons and reports?Weld like a "WELDOR", not a wel-"DERR" MillerDynasty700DX,Dynasty350DX4ea,Dynasty200DX,Li  ncolnSW200-2ea.,MillerMatic350P,MillerMatic200w/spoolgun,MKCobraMig260,Lincoln SP-170T,PlasmaCam/Hypertherm1250,HFProTig2ea,MigMax1ea.
Reply:AWS D1.1 has address that subject in every edition which I am familiar with as does ASME Section IX. Short answer is no if after 1992. Long answer depends on the a multitude of variables in certain situations.
Reply:Paragraph 4.3.1 of AWS D1.1:2010Qualification to Earlier Editions.Qualifications which were performed to and met the requirements of earlier editions of AWS D1.1 or AWS D1.0 or AWS 2.0 while those editions were in effect are valid and may be used.  The use of earlier editions shall be prohibited for new qualifications in lieu of the current edition, unless the specific early edition is specified in the contract documents.Experience is something you get right after you need it
回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|小黑屋|DiscuzX

GMT+8, 2025-12-27 18:52 , Processed in 0.103961 second(s), 18 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表