Hypertherm Powermax 65 vs. Miller Spectrum 875

admin

I will be powering either machine from a trailblazer 302. Eventually I would like to use it for cnc applications probably plasma cam. Basically I'm trying to figure out which plasma cutter will offer me the most cutting power out of the trailblazers 11,000 watt generator. Which one is the better machine?
Reply:Most Hypertherm owners wouldn't change brands, I don't think Miller owners can say the same when talking about plasmas.  BTW I am a Miller guy with all of my welding machines, but own a hypertherm plasma.
Reply:Yep, Hypertherm.A few weldersA lot of hammersA whole lot of C-clamps
Reply:Hypertherm has generator usage charts on its system brochures...as well as on the www.hypertherm.com website. Go to products, hand held plasma, choose the system, then choose the Spec. tab, scroll down. I have attached the one for the Powermax65.The 65 will likely cut up through about 1/2" or 5/8" running on your 11kw output. Hypertherm's big advantage vs the Miller is with the new Duramax torch technology. No moving parts (the spring electrode replaces the older technology torch plunger) for longer reliability, as well as the conical flow technology (shield and nozzle design) that increases arc energy density (faster, squarer, cleaner cuts at lower power) as well as improving nozzle orifice cooling (longer consumables life)Jim Colt Attached Images
Reply:The reason why I considered the miller 875 is that it seemed like it could cut thicker material using less watts from the generator for alot less money.
Reply:As I said...each of the units are very efficient inverters. To make the same amount of output power...which is amperage x voltage (kW)....each system will draw almost exactly the same power from your generator output. The Hypertherm torch is more efficient....meaning that at the same output power that the Miller torch cuts at...the Hypertherm will cut thicker and faster.One of the issues with the Hypertherm data...it is always very conservative! If we tell you it can cut a certain thickness at a certain speed and power level...you can bet that it will easily exceed that rating.Jim Colt Originally Posted by royalblue302The reason why I considered the miller 875 is that it seemed like it could cut thicker material using less watts from the generator for alot less money.
Reply:Thank you for the help Jim, I'll be going with the 65!