|
|
I just had to see for myself. granted its completely unscientific, and blowing smoke with no regulator (i should have used reg). and i dont really know what this data means, maybe its just doesnt mean anything because i botched up the "test" if you're not familiar with gas lense, it uses what appears to be a bigger cup, but the opening at the end of cup is the same size on both sets of pictures.anyway, here are the pics.first two pics are with traditional collet.pic 3 and 4 are with smoke lense. Attached Images
Reply:Gas lens, a bit more scientific...http://weldingweb.com/showpost.php?p=326388&postcount=28
Reply:hehe, thanks hotrodder, i stand corrected :P
Reply:If I`m not mistaken you can see that the smoke from the gas lens is diffused more....The smoke in the first pictures looks thicker. So I would guess the gas lens is doing it`s job.
Reply:I hope that torch is yours too....not sure if I would put my mouth on any torch in some of the shops I`ve worked for...
Reply:Shoot - I though we were looking at pictures sneaked out from the opium den!
Reply:Oxy,did you have a tungsten installed in these tests? I don't see one in the photos. If the tungsten is not present, gas/smoke will pass through the center hole in the collet body and the gas lens and not function properly.
Reply:opium den: good one, score!yes, that was my torchpulser, no tungsten. why didnt i think of that grrrrrrr
Reply:Originally Posted by oxy moronpulser, no tungsten. why didnt i think of that grrrrrrr
Reply:Umm, never seen anyone do that before. LOL
Reply:Nice Hookah!! Let me know when the next sit in is.Bill LambertArgon WeldingABQ NMSic gorgiamus allos subjectatos nunc
Reply:water cooled hookah! |
|