PQR for AWS D1.1

admin

Does AWS D1.1 allow 1 PQR (full penetration) to qulalify multiple WPSs for partial peneration.  Asuming same process. For example:A514 to 44WMCAW 1 X Fillet, 1 x Sg. Bevel PJP, 1 x Double Bevel PJP & 1 x Flare Bevel.All qualified by 1 full penitration PQR.
Reply:That makes sense to me, but I don't know if those are dissimalar metals that need a compatible filler. This is a great question for the AWS discussion forum.Weld like a "WELDOR", not a wel-"DERR" MillerDynasty700DX,Dynasty350DX4ea,Dynasty200DX,Li  ncolnSW200-2ea.,MillerMatic350P,MillerMatic200w/spoolgun,MKCobraMig260,Lincoln SP-170T,PlasmaCam/Hypertherm1250,HFProTig2ea,MigMax1ea.
Reply:Originally Posted by shovelonThat makes sense to me, but I don't know if those are dissimalar metals that need a compatible filler. This is a great question for the AWS discussion forum.
Reply:To my understanding each joint type would need a WPS when any of the essential variables are changed.
Reply:Originally Posted by Fat BastardTo my understanding each joint type would need a WPS when any of the essential variables are changed.
Reply:I think I found it:AWS D1.1 - 2006.  Table 4.5 - PQR Essential Changes Requiring WPS Re-Qualification.  General - Para 31.  Page 139.  Not sure if this cover it, but it sound like for groove type, a CJP will cover it.  Anyone go a copy of the 2006?
Reply:all of them need a seprate wps....not sure about the fillet weld..
Reply:Originally Posted by sixxgeeeeall of them need a seprate wps....not sure about the fillet weld..
Reply:Originally Posted by johna@ddiDoes AWS D1.1 allow 1 PQR (full penetration) to qulalify multiple WPSs for partial peneration.  Asuming same process. For example:A514 to 44WMCAW 1 X Fillet, 1 x Sg. Bevel PJP, 1 x Double Bevel PJP & 1 x Flare Bevel.All qualified by 1 full penitration PQR.